White v. State

359 S.W.3d 541, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 213, 2012 WL 549490
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 2012
DocketED 96476
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 S.W.3d 541 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 359 S.W.3d 541, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 213, 2012 WL 549490 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Irven White appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mabery v. State
359 S.W.3d 541 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 S.W.3d 541, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 213, 2012 WL 549490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-moctapp-2012.