White v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Kimberly White appeals the trial court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that her attorney was ineffective for failing to explain that she would be required to serve a minimum of three years for armed criminal action before becoming eligible for parole.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order, and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
935 S.W.2d 106 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.