White v. State

935 S.W.2d 106, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2062, 1996 WL 721074
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2159
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 1996·No. No. WD 52754·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Kimberly White appeals the trial court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that her attorney was ineffective for failing to explain that she would be required to serve a minimum of three years for armed criminal action before becoming eligible for parole.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order, and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 935 S.W.2d 106, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2062, 1996 WL 721074 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

935 S.W.2d 106 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.