White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

White v. State

889 S.W.2d 64, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1623, 1994 WL 565866

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1155 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1994·No. No. 64961·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

White v. State, 889 S.W.2d 64, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1623, 1994 WL 565866 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

889 S.W.2d 64 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.