White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

White v. State

939 S.W.2d 60, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 299, 1997 WL 90952

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 25, 1997

DocketNo. 70379

StatusPublished

This text of 939 S.W.2d 60 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 939 S.W.2d 60, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 299, 1997 WL 90952 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

939 S.W.2d 60, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 299, 1997 WL 90952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-moctapp-1997.