Johnson v. State
This text of 991 S.W.2d 192 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant Randall Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing on remand from this Court. Johnson v. State, 962 S.W.2d 892 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
991 S.W.2d 192, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-moctapp-1999.