White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

White v. State

914 S.W.2d 866, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 1996 WL 56250

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2159 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 1996·No. No. 68297·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

White v. State, 914 S.W.2d 866, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 1996 WL 56250 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

914 S.W.2d 866 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.