Wells v. State

150 S.W. 899
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was indicted, charged with embezzlement in an amount in excess of $50 — a felony. When tried, he was convicted of embezzlement of an amount less than $50 — a misdemeanor.

After adjournment of court, he attempts to perfect his appeal to this court by filing an appeal bond, not having entered into a recognizance during the term. Having been convicted of a misdemeanor only, the law does not authorize an appeal to be perfected by giving an appeal bond. Article 918, Code of Criminal Procedure; Herron v. State, 27 Tex. 337; Cook v. State, 8 Tex, App. 671. The motion of the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. State, 150 S.W. 899 (Tex. 1912).

150 S.W. 899 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welch v. State
199 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Knowlton and Dominguez v. State
169 S.W. 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)