Knowlton and Dominguez v. State

169 S.W. 674, 75 Tex. Crim. 8, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 401
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 1914·No. No. 3168.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Appellants were indicted for assault with intent to murder. When tried they were convicted of aggravated assault. They entered into no recognizance. Instead they gave appeal bonds. *Page 9

The State moves to dismiss the appeal because no recognizance was entered into. Under the statute and decisions the motion must be sustained. C.C.P., arts. 918 and 920; Wells v. State,68 Tex. Crim. 276, 150 S.W. Rep., 899; Hamilton v. State,68 Tex. Crim. 47, 150 S.W. Rep., 775.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

ADDITIONAL OPINION.
June 17, 1914.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knowlton and Dominguez v. State, 169 S.W. 674, 75 Tex. Crim. 8, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 401 (Tex. 1914).

169 S.W. 674 (Knowlton and Dominguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitcomb v. State
190 S.W.2d 484 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Bennett v. State
194 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)