Knowlton and Dominguez v. State

169 S.W. 674, 75 Tex. Crim. 8, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 401
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 17, 1914
DocketNo. 3168.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 169 S.W. 674 (Knowlton and Dominguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knowlton and Dominguez v. State, 169 S.W. 674, 75 Tex. Crim. 8, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 401 (Tex. 1914).

Opinions

Appellants were indicted for assault with intent to murder. When tried they were convicted of aggravated assault. They entered into no recognizance. Instead they gave appeal bonds. *Page 9

The State moves to dismiss the appeal because no recognizance was entered into. Under the statute and decisions the motion must be sustained. C.C.P., arts. 918 and 920; Wells v. State,68 Tex. Crim. 276, 150 S.W. Rep., 899; Hamilton v. State,68 Tex. Crim. 47, 150 S.W. Rep., 775.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

ADDITIONAL OPINION.
June 17, 1914.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitcomb v. State
190 S.W.2d 484 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Bennett v. State
194 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.W. 674, 75 Tex. Crim. 8, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knowlton-and-dominguez-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.