Herron v. State

27 Tex. 337
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1863·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Bell, J.

The motion by the attorney-general, to dismiss the appeal, is granted. There is no recognizance, as is required by law in cases of appeal. (Oldham & White’s Dig., art. 722.) There is an appeal bond, which appears to have been approved by the clerk of the court, on the 20th of March, 1863. The trial of the case seems to have taken place on the 5th day of the same month, and the judgment of the court to have been rendered on that day. The appeal bond is not sufficient to sustain the appeal. The law requires a recognizance, which must be taken in open ¡court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herron v. State, 27 Tex. 337 (Tex. 1863).

27 Tex. 337 (Herron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welch v. State
199 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Whitcomb v. State
190 S.W.2d 484 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Knowlton and Dominguez v. State
169 S.W. 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Hamilton v. State
150 S.W. 775 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Wells v. State
151 S.W. 303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Terry v. State
142 S.W. 875 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Jones v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 485 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Harris v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 134 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)