Wells v. State

151 S.W. 303, 68 Tex. Crim. 276, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 610
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 1912·No. No. 1891.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

— Appellant was indicted, charged with embezzlement in an amount in excess of fifty dollars — a felony. When tried he was convicted of embezzlement of an amount less than fifty dollars — a misdemeanor.

After adjournment of court he attempts to perfect his appeal to this court by filing an appeal bond, not having entered into a recognizance during the term. Having been convicted of a misdemeanor only, the law does not authorize an appeal to be perfected by giving an appeal bond. (Art. 918, Code of Criminal Procedure; Herron v. State, 27 Texas, 337; Cook v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 671.) The motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. State, 151 S.W. 303, 68 Tex. Crim. 276, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 610 (Tex. 1912).

151 S.W. 303 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
203 S.W. 52 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Welch v. State
199 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Knowlton and Dominguez v. State
169 S.W. 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)