Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wells v. State

Wells v. State

666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 21676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wells v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9474 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1996·No. No. 94-3808·Published

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

The trial court failed to enter a contemporaneous order outlining its reasons for departure in violation of the dictates of Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). We, therefore, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the sentencing guidelines.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. State, 666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 21676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

666 So. 2d 1016 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)