Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wells v. State

630 So. 2d 1215, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 195, 1994 WL 12240

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1994

DocketNo. 92-2363

StatusPublished

This text of 630 So. 2d 1215 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells v. State, 630 So. 2d 1215, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 195, 1994 WL 12240 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgments and sentences which were imposed following his pleas of guilty; however, we modify the sentencing orders relative to appellant’s three convictions for attempted forgery, a misdemeanor, to delete the habitual offender designation for these offenses because a misdemeanor conviction “is not subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute.” Brown v. State, 626 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993):

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgments and sentences which were imposed following his pleas of guilty; however, we modify the sentencing orders relative to appellant’s three convictions for attempted forgery, a misdemeanor, to delete the habitual offender designation for these offenses because a misdemeanor conviction “is not subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute.” Brown v. State, 626 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993):

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

630 So. 2d 1215, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 195, 1994 WL 12240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack