Wells v. State
638 So. 2d 1064, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6827, 1994 WL 328528
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wells v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 598 So. 2d 259 →
Opinion
Appellant’s convictions and sentences for first-degree robbery and burglary are reversed in accordance with Spellman v. State, 529 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 245 (Fla.1988); Johnson v. State, 560 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); and Hamilton v. State, 494 So.2d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), and the cause is remanded with directions that appellant be adjudged guilty of second-degree robbery and burglary and resentenced accordingly.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wells v. State, 638 So. 2d 1064, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6827, 1994 WL 328528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
638 So. 2d 1064 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamilton v. State
494 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Spellman v. State
529 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Johnson v. State
560 So. 2d 1379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)