Wells v. State

666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 21676
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1996
DocketNo. 94-3808
StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 1016 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. State, 666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 21676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

The trial court failed to enter a contemporaneous order outlining its reasons for departure in violation of the dictates of Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). We, therefore, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the sentencing guidelines.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 21676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.