Weinstein v. Weinstein

875 A.2d 545, 273 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 187
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 4, 2005
DocketSC 17425
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 875 A.2d 545 (Weinstein v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weinstein v. Weinstein, 875 A.2d 545, 273 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 187 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 699 (AC 24855), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[935]*935The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17425. Lori Welch-Rubin, in support of the petition. Luke A. Weinstein, pro se, in opposition. Decided May 4, 2005

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment on the basis that the trial court had improperly imputed an amount of investment income to the defendant?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weinstein v. Weinstein
911 A.2d 1077 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Zitnay v. Zitnay
875 A.2d 583 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 A.2d 545, 273 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-weinstein-conn-2005.