Loughlin v. Loughlin

895 A.2d 798, 277 Conn. 926, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 108
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 23, 2006
DocketSC 17634
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 895 A.2d 798 (Loughlin v. Loughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loughlin v. Loughlin, 895 A.2d 798, 277 Conn. 926, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 108 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 618 (AC 25611), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had improperly relied on the total length of the parties’ relationship in fashioning its financial orders?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had improperly relied on the presence of the parties’ adult children and grandchild in the home in fashioning its alimony award?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loughlin v. Loughlin
910 A.2d 963 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 A.2d 798, 277 Conn. 926, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loughlin-v-loughlin-conn-2006.