Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Kupstis v. Michaud

Kupstis v. Michaud

573 A.2d 315, 214 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 71
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 8, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 573 A.2d 315 (Kupstis v. Michaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kupstis v. Michaud, 573 A.2d 315, 214 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 71 (Colo. 1990).

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 425, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the attorney referee’s delay in issuing his report violate (a) General Statutes § 51-183b; (b) applicable provisions of the Practice Book; or (c) the due process [768]*768rights of the plaintiff under the United States constitution or article first, § 10, of the Connecticut constitution?”

Decided February 8, 1990 Michael A. D’Amico, in support of the petition. Robert J. Crean, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caruso v. Caruso, No. Cv 02 0465379 (Feb. 19, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2790-t (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
Frank v. Frank, No. 094162 (Apr. 22, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3684 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
Kupstis v. Michaud
576 A.2d 152 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 A.2d 315, 214 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kupstis-v-michaud-conn-1990.