Washington v. State

37 So. 3d 376, 2010 WL 2219676
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 2010·No. 1D09-3132·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

37 So.3d 376 (2010)

Aubrey WASHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-3132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 2010.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders[1] appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for correction of an apparent scrivener's error on the order revoking Appellant's probation. The order revoking Appellant's probation states that the court found Appellant in violation of condition four of his probation. The Order of Probation provides that condition four is to "not possess, carry[,] or own any firearm or weapon, unless authorized by the court." This condition was never at issue, and the trial court made no oral pronouncements that Appellant possessed, carried, or owned any firearms or weapons. Rather, the trial court orally pronounced that Appellant violated his probation by possessing marijuana and driving while his license was suspended or revoked, as a habitual offender. This violation relates to the condition requiring him to "live without violating the law." According to the Order of Probation, this condition was number five.

Based on the trial court's oral pronouncements and the substantive requirements of conditions four and five, it is clear that the notation that Appellant violated condition four was merely a scrivener's error. For this reason, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence but remand the case to the trial court for correction of the order revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found guilty of violating the condition requiring him to "live without violating the law."

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 37 So. 3d 376, 2010 WL 2219676 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

37 So. 3d 376 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. State
252 So. 3d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Jairo Lainez Padilla v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Tavares Spellman-Folmar v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Spellman-Folmar v. State
243 So. 3d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Strickland v. State
243 So. 3d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Zachariah Strickland v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Stephanie M. Sousie v. State of Florida
242 So. 3d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Trey Harris v. State of Florida
229 So. 3d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Hutchison v. State
209 So. 3d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
William Hutchison v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Hughes v. State
204 So. 3d 579 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
King v. State
201 So. 3d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Jones v. State
164 So. 3d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Wally Joe Jones v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015
Rushing v. State
160 So. 3d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Williams v. State
138 So. 3d 1102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Clark v. State
85 So. 3d 1190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Nickolas v. State
66 So. 3d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Cain v. State
49 So. 3d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)