King v. State
201 So. 3d 206, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14539
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2016·No. No. 1D16-1380·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence. However, the written sentence contains a scrivener’s error. We remand for the trial court to correct the written sentence to reflect that the sentence imposed in case 16-2015-CF-6823 is to run concurrently with the sen[207]*207tence imposed in case 16-2015-CF-6822. See Washington v. State, 37 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 201 So. 3d 206, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14539 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
201 So. 3d 206 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Evans v. State
257 So. 3d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Roberts v. State
252 So. 3d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Mark C. Roberts v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Tavares Spellman-Folmar v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Spellman-Folmar v. State
243 So. 3d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Strickland v. State
243 So. 3d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Zachariah Strickland v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Stephanie M. Sousie v. State of Florida
242 So. 3d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Williams v. State
230 So. 3d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Shavogue Shantrice Janell Williams v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017