Spellman-Folmar v. State

243 So. 3d 533
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 2018·No. No. 1D17–3082·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm appellant's convictions and sentences, but remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the written judgment. Appellant pleaded guilty to all five counts charged in the information, and the trial court orally adjudicated him guilty of all five counts. Count five was included on the fourth page of the written judgment, but omitted from the first page. On remand, the lower tribunal shall enter a corrected written judgment that conforms to the court's oral pronouncement of guilt on all five counts. See King v. State , 201 So.3d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (affirming an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's errors in the written judgment); Washington v. State , 37 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (same).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spellman-Folmar v. State, 243 So. 3d 533 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

243 So. 3d 533 (Spellman-Folmar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. State
37 So. 3d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
King v. State
201 So. 3d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)