Padilla v. State

252 So. 3d 419
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2018·No. No. 1D17-0818·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this Anders* appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence. However, the written sentence contains a scrivener's error. We remand for the trial court to correct the written sentence to reflect that it imposed a public defender application fee. The box for that fee remains unchecked despite the fee being orally imposed and the money included in the total amount in the judgment and sentence. See Washington v. State , 37 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's error).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padilla v. State, 252 So. 3d 419 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

252 So. 3d 419 (Padilla v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Washington v. State
37 So. 3d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)