Ward v. Maloney

Fourth Circuit

Ward v. Maloney

250 F. App'x 595

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2007·No. No. 07-1793·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order denying his post judgment motion for the district court judge to recuse himself. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Maloney, No. l:05-cv-00424 (M.D.N.C. July 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order denying his post judgment motion for the district court judge to recuse himself. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Maloney, No. l:05-cv-00424 (M.D.N.C. July 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ward v. Maloney, 250 F. App'x 595 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

250 F. App'x 595 (Ward v. Maloney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.