Ward v. Maloney
This text of Ward v. Maloney (Ward v. Maloney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2254
MARK A. WARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator; JOHN T. MCDONALD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00054-WO-PTS)
Submitted: March 16, 2009 Decided: April 1, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. David Aaron Kushner, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Ward’s civil claims with prejudice and issuing a
prefiling injunction against Ward. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Maloney, No.
1:08-cv-00054-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ward v. Maloney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-maloney-ca4-2009.