Ward v. Maloney

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2009
Docket08-2254
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ward v. Maloney (Ward v. Maloney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Maloney, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2254

MARK A. WARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator; JOHN T. MCDONALD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00054-WO-PTS)

Submitted: March 16, 2009 Decided: April 1, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. David Aaron Kushner, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing Ward’s civil claims with prejudice and issuing a

prefiling injunction against Ward. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Maloney, No.

1:08-cv-00054-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ward v. Maloney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-maloney-ca4-2009.