Ward v. Maloney

171 F. App'x 986
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 2006·No. 05-1994·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Peter E. Maloney, administrator of the LIN Broadcasting Corporation Retirement Plan, whom Ward claimed failed to produce documents pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ward v. Maloney, 386 F.Supp.2d 607 (M.D.N.C.2005) (No. CA-05-424). We also deny Ward’s motion for preparation of a transcript at the government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Maloney, 171 F. App'x 986 (4th Cir. 2006).

171 F. App'x 986 (Ward v. Maloney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Maloney
386 F. Supp. 2d 607 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)