Ward v. Maloney

Fourth Circuit

Ward v. Maloney

158 F. App'x 446

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2005·No. 05-1669·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court judgment granting Peter Maloney’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and the district court memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Ward v. Maloney, CA-03-1170-1, 2005 WL 1167230 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court judgment granting Peter Maloney’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and the district court memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Ward v. Maloney, CA-03-1170-1, 2005 WL 1167230 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ward v. Maloney, 158 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

158 F. App'x 446 (Ward v. Maloney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.