Walker v. State
886 So. 2d 1007, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15672, 2004 WL 2375603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 2004·No. No. 1D03-3809·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence, alleging that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow a witness, who had been disclosed to the State, to testify at trial. The State concedes error. Donaldson v. State, 656 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Thus, Appellant’s conviction and sentence are reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. State, 886 So. 2d 1007, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15672, 2004 WL 2375603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 1007 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum
912 So. 2d 561 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Cone v. State, Dept. of Health
886 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)