Walker v. State

824 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10339, 2002 WL 1625558
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 742 So. 2d 342
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2002·No. No. 4D01-2763·Published

Opinion

SHAHOOD, J.

Based on Holsman v. Cohen, 667 So.2d 769, 771 (Fla.1996), and Administrative Order No. VII-01-B-10,1 appellant, Richard Walker, was tried in County Court, by a Circuit Court Judge, acting as a County Court judge, on a temporary, regular basis. Hence, this court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal under rule 9.030(b)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (2002) and section 924.08, Florida Statutes (2000)(appeaJs from final judgments in misdemeanor eases tried by county courts shall be to the circuit court). Accordingly, this appeal is transferred to the appropriate court (Seventeenth Judicial Circuit) under rule 9.040(b)(l)(if a proceeding is commenced in an inappropriate court, that court shall transfer the cause to an appropriate court).

In as much as we are without jurisdiction to hear this appeal, we decline to address any other issues raised by appellant.

Appeal transferred to Circuit Court.

STEVENSON and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 824 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10339, 2002 WL 1625558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

824 So. 2d 244 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holsman v. Cohen
667 So. 2d 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)