Walker v. State

764 So. 2d 727, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7995, 2000 WL 862628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 So. 2d 1258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2000·No. No. 2D97-2396·Published

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Eric Walker has raised two issues in this appeal from his sentencing. His first contention, that the trial court erred in scoring victim injury as severe, is without merit. Victim injury scoring is within the trial judge’s discretion, and we affirm the judge’s factual determination as to the severity. See Gregory v. State, 666 So.2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Mr. Walker’s second contention concerns the application of the 1995 sentencing guidelines to his offense, which occurred on August 16, 1996. We remand this case to the trial judge to reconsider this sentence. See Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 764 So. 2d 727, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7995, 2000 WL 862628 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

764 So. 2d 727 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory v. State
666 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)