Walker v. State

708 So. 2d 1044, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5043, 1998 WL 219722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1998·No. No. 96-3904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While we affirm Appellant’s conviction for possession of cannabis with intent to sell, the state acknowledges that the trial court should have granted Appellant’s motion to dismiss the other charge of possession of [1045]*1045cannabis in excess of twenty grams. Therefore, we reverse as to count II and remand.

STONE, C.J., and STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 708 So. 2d 1044, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5043, 1998 WL 219722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

708 So. 2d 1044 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacIas v. State
708 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)