Walker v. State

660 So. 2d 361, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9646, 1995 WL 539072
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 1995·No. No. 94-03445·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine. We find no error as to the appellant’s conviction and therefore affirm as to that conviction. However, we strike certain costs imposed upon the appellant since they are discretionary costs which were not announced at sentencing. Specifically, we strike the $50 cost imposed under section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1993); the $2 cost imposed under section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993); and the $200 cost imposed under section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1993), for public defender fees. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence and strike the improperly imposed costs. On remand, the state may seek reim-position of the costs with proper notice to the appellant. See Fortt v. State, 658 So.2d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 660 So. 2d 361, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9646, 1995 WL 539072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

660 So. 2d 361 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Del Valle v. State
26 So. 3d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)