Walker v. State

759 So. 2d 743, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6641, 2000 WL 690121
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 So. 2d 1258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2000·No. No. 4D00-0382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our original opinion, dated March 22, 2000, after disqualification of Judge Mark E. Polen from this Court’s panel due to his participation, as circuit court judge, in the underlying case.1 Upon reconsideration of this appeal, with Judge Carole Y. Taylor randomly assigned to the panel in Judge Polen’s place, we affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion; however, we modify the trial court’s bar on any future pro se filings in the underlying case. The bar shall be against any future pro se filings concerning any issues which were or should have been raised on direct appeal or in prior post-conviction proceedings. See Johnson v. State, 742 So.2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

DELL, STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 759 So. 2d 743, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6641, 2000 WL 690121 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

759 So. 2d 743 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
742 So. 2d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)