Walker v. State
This text of 807 So. 2d 177 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerome S. WALKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
FULMER, Judge.
Jerome S. Walker challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion filed *178 pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct an error on the face of the sentencing guidelines score-sheet. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Walker alleged, and the State conceded, that there was a mathematical error in the addition of the points scored in the prior record category of the scoresheet. The trial court denied the motion, finding that Walker's sentence was within the sentencing range of the corrected scoresheet. However, "[b]ecause the attachments to the order denying relief do not conclusively demonstrate that [Walker] would have received the same sentence with a correct scoresheet, he is entitled to be resentenced with an accurate scoresheet." Collins v. State, 788 So.2d 1109, 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded.
SALCINES, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
807 So. 2d 177, 2002 WL 220028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.