Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Walker v. State

Walker v. State

828 So. 2d 501, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15500, 2002 WL 31374839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10676 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 2002·No. No. 3D02-2427·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222, 1223-1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that prior sentencing as a youthful offender does not preclude consideration in habitual offender proceeding of such crimes as predicate offenses); Gadsen v. State, 805 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Whitfield v. Singletary, 730 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also Arce v. State, 762 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming the denial of motion to correct sentence under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) where defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 828 So. 2d 501, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15500, 2002 WL 31374839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

828 So. 2d 501 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arce v. State
762 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Weford v. State
784 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Whitfield v. Singletary
730 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Gadsen v. State
805 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)