Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Arce v. State

Arce v. State

762 So. 2d 1003, 2000 WL 873338
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 2000
Docket4D00-1565
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 762 So. 2d 1003 (Arce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arce v. State, 762 So. 2d 1003, 2000 WL 873338 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

762 So.2d 1003 (2000)

Jose M. ARCE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D00-1565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 2000.
Rehearing Denied August 14, 2000.

Jose M. Arce, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jose M. Arce seeks review of an order that denied his motion to correct his sentence. Arce argued in his motion that the 1995 guidelines used in his sentencing proceedings are unconstitutional. Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Arce argued further that his offense took place on August 28, 1996, within the applicable window period for presenting such a challenge. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000)(window period to begin on October 1, 1995, and close on May 24, 1997).

We affirm as the trial court properly denied Arce's motion. Arce was sentenced as a habitual offender to a twenty-year prison term. Compare Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(trial court declined to treat defendant as a habitual offender but imposed the maximum sentence permitted under the 1995 guidelines). Pursuant to Florida Statute section 775.084(4)(e), a habitual offender sentence is not subject to the guidelines provisions of section 921.001.

*1004 Accordingly, the trial court's denial is proper.

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
78 So. 3d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
De La Rosa v. State
979 So. 2d 1089 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Sims v. State
957 So. 2d 19 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Tannihill v. State
848 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Fisher v. State
829 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Walker v. State
828 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Lemon
825 So. 2d 927 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Freeman v. State
807 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Nix v. State
795 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Collins v. State
792 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Ellis v. State
785 So. 2d 677 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hembree v. State
785 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Simmons v. State
780 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Kenon v. State
780 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Green v. State
776 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Heaton v. State
775 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Black v. State
771 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
West v. State
767 So. 2d 1258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Lemon v. State
769 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Lopez v. State
768 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 So. 2d 1003, 2000 WL 873338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arce-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.