Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Heaton v. State

Heaton v. State

775 So. 2d 1002, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 34, 2001 WL 6174
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 3, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-4276
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 1002 (Heaton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heaton v. State, 775 So. 2d 1002, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 34, 2001 WL 6174 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence. See Welling v. State, 748 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Arce v. State, 762 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant presenting his gain-time claim administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if necessary, seeking review of the Department’s ultimate decision through extraordinary writ petition to the circuit court. See Gatto v. State, 768 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baez v. State
780 So. 2d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 1002, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 34, 2001 WL 6174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaton-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.