Vaughn v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Kenneth Vaughn (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, after holding an evidentiary hearing, of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 1 motion. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of felony burglary in the second degree in violation of Section 569.170 2 and misdemeanor stealing in violation of Section 570.030, and sentenced as a persistent felony offender pursuant to Section 558.016 to concurrent terms of imprisonment for eight years and one year, respectively. 3
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings- and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise stated.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise stated.
.This court affirmed Movant’s conviction in State v. Vaughn, 136 S.W.3d 125 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
219 S.W.3d 789 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.