Vaughn v. State

219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 616, 2007 WL 1120304
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2007·No. ED 88322·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Vaughn (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, after holding an evidentiary hearing, of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 1 motion. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of felony burglary in the second degree in violation of Section 569.170 2 and misdemeanor stealing in violation of Section 570.030, and sentenced as a persistent felony offender pursuant to Section 558.016 to concurrent terms of imprisonment for eight years and one year, respectively. 3

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings- and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise stated.

2

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise stated.

3

.This court affirmed Movant’s conviction in State v. Vaughn, 136 S.W.3d 125 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn v. State, 219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 616, 2007 WL 1120304 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

219 S.W.3d 789 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinchen v. State
219 S.W.3d 789 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)