State v. Vaughn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Vaughn

136 S.W.3d 125, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 767, 2004 WL 1151709

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 25, 2004

DocketNo. ED 83025

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.W.3d 125 (State v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vaughn, 136 S.W.3d 125, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 767, 2004 WL 1151709 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth L. Vaughn appeals from the judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of second-degree burglary and misdemeanor stealing in violation of sections 569.170 and 570.030, RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the State to argue during its opening statement.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the [126]*126reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth L. Vaughn appeals from the judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of second-degree burglary and misdemeanor stealing in violation of sections 569.170 and 570.030, RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the State to argue during its opening statement.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the [126]*126reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.W.3d 125, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 767, 2004 WL 1151709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vaughn-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack