Vaughn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vaughn v. State

215 S.W.3d 213, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1956, 2006 WL 3770777

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vaughn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 616 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2006·No. No. WD 66166·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Dion Vaughn appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. He asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object or request any relief after a venireperson made a remark during voir dire about Mr. Vaughn’s alibi witness and for failing to object to an in-court identification by a State’s witness. In addition, he asserts that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the in-court identification on appeal.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Dion Vaughn appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. He asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object or request any relief after a venireperson made a remark during voir dire about Mr. Vaughn’s alibi witness and for failing to object to an in-court identification by a State’s witness. In addition, he asserts that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the in-court identification on appeal.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Vaughn v. State, 215 S.W.3d 213, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1956, 2006 WL 3770777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

215 S.W.3d 213 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.