Kinchen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kinchen v. State

219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 618, 2007 WL 1120302

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2007

DocketED 88376

StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W.3d 789 (Kinchen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinchen v. State, 219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 618, 2007 WL 1120302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Kinchen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Kinchen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 618, 2007 WL 1120302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinchen-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack