Kinchen v. State
219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 618, 2007 WL 1120302
Opinion
ORDER
John Kinchen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kinchen v. State, 219 S.W.3d 789, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 618, 2007 WL 1120302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
219 S.W.3d 789 (Kinchen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vaughn v. State
219 S.W.3d 789 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Kinchen
178 S.W.3d 602 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)