Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports·Decided May 20, 1996·No. 96-203·Published

Opinion

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

State of California

DANIEL E. LUNGREN

Attorney General

______________________________________

OPINION : : No. 96-203 of : : May 20, 1996 DANIEL E. LUNGREN : Attorney General : : CLAYTON P. ROCHE : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________

THE HONORABLE LOUIS B. GREEN, COUNTY COUNSEL, EL DORADO COUNTY, has requested an opinion on the following question:

Does the Board of Supervisors of El Dorado County have the authority to approve or veto the appointment of a particular candidate for court commissioner selected by a majority of the judges of the superior court?

CONCLUSION

The Board of Supervisors of El Dorado County does not have the authority to approve or veto the appointment of a particular candidate for court commissioner selected by a majority of the judges of the superior court.

ANALYSIS

Section 70141.1 of the Government Code,1 enacted in 1988 (Stats. 1988, ch. 196, ' 1), provides as follows:

1 All section references are to the Government Code unless otherwise provided.

1. 96-203

"In El Dorado County, a majority of the judges of the superior court, subject to prior approval by the board of supervisors, may appoint one or more commissioners up to one full-time equivalent. The superior court may provide that the commissioner, in addition to the duties prescribed in section 259 of the Code of Civil Procedure, shall perform the duties of a probate commissioner appointed pursuant to section 69897 or any other duties authorized by law for a commissioner to perform. The superior court may also authorize the commissioner to perform the duties of a juvenile court referee appointed pursuant to section 247 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

"Any commissioner appointed pursuant to this section shall receive compensation pursuant to a contract approved annually by the board of supervisors. The presiding judge of the superior court shall specify the days, hours, and court locations for the commissioner. Each commissioner shall also be allowed actual traveling expenses pursuant to section 70148." (Italics added.)

We are asked whether this statute permits the board of supervisors to approve or veto a candidate for court commissioner selected by a majority of the judges of the superior court. We conclude that the words "subject to prior approval by the board of supervisors" as used in section 70141.1 refer not to the approval of a particular candidate, but to the preliminary funding decision by the board of supervisors with respect to the position.

Section 22 of article VI of the Constitution provides: "The Legislature may provide for the appointment by trial courts of record of officers such as commissioners to perform subordinate judicial duties." Commissioners in superior courts have been constitutionally recognized since 1879.2

The general powers of a court commissioner are described in Code of Civil Procedure section 259:

"Subject to the supervision of the court every court commissioner shall have power to do all of the following:

2 Article VI, section 14 of the Constitution of 1879 provided:

"The Legislature shall provide for the election of a Clerk of the Supreme Court, and shall fix by law his duties and compensation, which compensation shall not be increased or diminished during the term for which he shall have been elected. The County Clerks shall be ex officio clerks of the courts of record in and for their respective counties, or cities and counties. The Legislature may also provide for the appointment, by the several Superior Courts, of one or more commissioners in their respective counties, or cities and counties, with authority to perform chamber business of the Judges of the Superior Courts, to take depositions, and perform such other business connected with the administration of justice as may be prescribed by law."

As discussed below, court commissioners are also now authorized for municipal courts. ('' 72190-72192.)

2. 96-203

"(a) Hear and determine ex parte motions, for orders and alternative writs and writs of habeas corpus in the superior court for which the court commissioner is appointed.

"(b) Take proof and make and report findings thereon as to any matter of fact upon which information is required by the court. Any party to any contested proceeding may except to the report and the subsequent order of the court made thereon within five days after written notice of the court's action. A copy of the exceptions shall be filed and served upon opposing party or counsel within the five days. The party may argue any exceptions before the court on giving notice of motion for that purpose within 10 days from entry thereof. After a hearing before the court on the exceptions, the court may sustain, or set aside, or modify its order.

"(c) Take and approve any bonds and undertakings in actions or proceedings, and determine objections to the bonds and undertakings.

"(d) Administer oaths and affirmations, and take affidavits and depositions in any action or proceeding in any of the courts of this state, or in any matter or proceeding whatever, and take acknowledgments and proof of deeds, mortgages, and other instruments requiring proof or acknowledgment for any purpose under the laws of this or any other state or country.

"(e) Act as temporary judge when otherwise qualified so to act and when appointed for that purpose, or by written consent of an appearing party. While acting as temporary judge the commissioner shall receive no compensation therefor other than compensation as commissioner.

"(f) Hear and report findings and conclusions to the court for approval, rejection, or change, all preliminary matters including motions or petitions for the custody and support of children, the allowance of temporary spousal support, costs and attorneys' fees, and issues of fact in contempt proceedings in proceedings for support, dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, or legal separation.

"(g) Hear actions filed by the district attorney to establish paternity and to establish or enforce child support pursuant to Section 640.1.

"(h) Hear, report on, and determine all uncontested actions and proceedings subject to the requirements of subdivision (e).

"(i) Charge and collect the same fees for the performance of official acts as are allowed by law to notaries public in this state for like services. This subdivision does not apply to any services of the commissioner, the compensation for which is expressly fixed by law. The fees so collected shall be paid to the treasurer of the county, for deposit in the general fund of the county.

3. 96-203

"(j) Provide an official seal, upon which must be engraved the words "Court Commissioner" and the name of the county, or city and county, in which the commissioner resides.

"(k) Authenticate with the official seal the commissioner's official acts."

A court commissioner's duties have been judicially examined in various contests. (See In Re Horton (1991) 54 Cal.3d 82, 90; Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 351, 361-362; In Re Courtney (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1221, 1222-1225; Loeb & Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1110, 1120-1121; see also 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 162 (1984).)

Although section 70141.1 is applicable only to El Dorado County, the Legislature has enacted section 70141, applicable to the appointment of court commissioners in virtually all counties.3 Section 70141 states:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, (Cal. 1996).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion (Untitled California Attorney General Opinion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlos v. Superior Court
672 P.2d 862 (California Supreme Court, 1983)
Anderson v. Superior Court
907 P.2d 1312 (California Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Davenport
710 P.2d 861 (California Supreme Court, 1985)
Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long Beach
759 P.2d 504 (California Supreme Court, 1988)
In Re Catalano
623 P.2d 228 (California Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re Horton
813 P.2d 1335 (California Supreme Court, 1991)
Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.
515 P.2d 297 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
Loeb & Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc.
166 Cal. App. 3d 1110 (California Court of Appeal, 1985)
People v. Robert B.
39 Cal. App. 4th 1816 (California Court of Appeal, 1995)
People v. Courtney H.
38 Cal. App. 4th 1221 (California Court of Appeal, 1995)
Rowe v. Superior Court
15 Cal. App. 4th 1711 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
Harrington v. Pardee
82 P. 83 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
People ex rel. Wetherbee v. Cazneau
20 Cal. 503 (California Supreme Court, 1862)