United States v. Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEMETRIUS MARCUS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Meat,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-6)

Submitted: March 8, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius Marcus Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Marcus Williams appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2009). * We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We note that the district court lacked the authority to consider Williams’s motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010).