United States v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 F. App'x 221
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2008·No. 08-6894·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6894

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANIF CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00010-jpj-2)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anif Christopher Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anif Christopher Williams appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008)

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:93-cr-00010-jpj-2 (W.D.

Va. May 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related