United States v. Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6894
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANIF CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00010-jpj-2)
Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anif Christopher Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anif Christopher Williams appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:93-cr-00010-jpj-2 (W.D.
Va. May 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.