United States v. Williams

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Williams

160 F. App'x 328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 2006

Docket05-7299

StatusUnpublished

This text of 160 F. App'x 328 (United States v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Williams, 160 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. CR-00-119 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. CR-00-119 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 F. App'x 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-williams-ca4-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack