United States v. Williams

294 F. App'x 36
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 F. App'x 221
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2008·No. 08-6987·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randy Gean Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 2:99-cr-00116-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2008). We grant Williams’ motion to supplement the record pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the coui’t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 294 F. App'x 36 (4th Cir. 2008).

294 F. App'x 36 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related