United States v. William Cross

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2013
Docket12-7800
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. William Cross (United States v. William Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Cross, (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7800

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s

margin order denying his motion to correct a clerical error. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United

States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27,

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. William Cross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-cross-ca4-2013.