United States v. William Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2015·No. 15-6122·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6122

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Cross appeals the district court’s margin order

denying his motion for writ of error coram nobis. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cross,

No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5 & entered Jan. 8,

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William Cross, (4th Cir. 2015).

United States v. William Cross (United States v. William Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.