United States v. William Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2011·No. 11-6692·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6692

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-7307

No. 11-7308

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motions for relief under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36,

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and Fed. R. App. P. 10(e). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s orders. United States v. Cross,

No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 10 & entered May 11,

2011; filed Aug. 26 & entered Aug. 29, 2011; & Sept. 2, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William Cross, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. William Cross (United States v. William Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related