Brent v. Kupec

Fourth Circuit

Brent v. Kupec

159 F. App'x 484

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2005·No. No. 05-6909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Brent appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brent v. Kupec, No. CA-04-1-3746 (D.Md. May 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Brent appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brent v. Kupec, No. CA-04-1-3746 (D.Md. May 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Brent v. Kupec, 159 F. App'x 484 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

159 F. App'x 484 (Brent v. Kupec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related