United States v. Walker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6255

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FREDDIE EUGENE WALKER, a/k/a Big Freddie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-95-39)

Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 3, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddie Eugene Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Freddie Eugene Walker appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-95-39 (E.D.

Va. Nov. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -