United States v. Walker
51 F. App'x 465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F. App'x 188 →
Opinion
Courtney H. Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-94-18 (M.D.N.C. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Walker, 51 F. App'x 465 (4th Cir. 2002).
51 F. App'x 465 (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.